Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Apr 2010 21:40 UTC, submitted by Helge
Legal Well, this certainly explains a whole lot. Both Apple and Microsoft have stated that the legality of Theora is highly debatable, and as it turns out, they knew more than we do - most likely courtesy of their close involvement with the MPEG-LA. Responding to an email from Free Software Foundation Europe activist Hugo Roy, Steve Jobs has stated that a patent pool is being assembled to go after Theora. Update: Monty Montgomery of Xiph (Ogg and Theora's parent organisation) has responded on Slashdot: "If Jobs's email is genuine, this is a powerful public gaffe ('All video codecs are covered by patents'). He'd be confirming MPEG's assertion in plain language anyone can understand. It would only strengthen the pushback against software patents and add to Apple's increasing PR mess. Macbooks and iPads may be pretty sweet, but creative individuals don't really like to give their business to jackbooted thugs."
Thread beginning with comment 422299
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Flash for Future?
by segedunum on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:41 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Flash for Future?"
segedunum
Member since:
2005-07-06

It's not a re-encode, it's a container format change.

Support for a new codec has nothing to do with the container. Most web video for Flash is still Sorensen and VP6 behind the scenes, so yes, we are talking about a mass re-encode job if we're going to somehow claim that h.264 is widely used for web video currently.

Again, trying to somehow claim h.264 is widely used for web video because Flash video can now support it as an input is just plain wrong. I'm afraid you're talking nonsense. Moving to h.264 is a hell of a lot more than simply switching from Flash to HTML5 video as a container.

Edited 2010-05-02 22:44 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Flash for Future?
by bhtooefr on Sun 2nd May 2010 22:43 in reply to "RE[6]: Flash for Future?"
bhtooefr Member since:
2009-02-19

Except a large percentage web video is YouTube, and YouTube's vids are all H.264.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Flash for Future?
by segedunum on Sun 2nd May 2010 23:03 in reply to "RE[7]: Flash for Future?"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

Except a large percentage web video is YouTube, and YouTube's vids are all H.264.

They're not. h.264 support in Flash players was only added around 2007 and the original format might not even be h.264, quite apart from the lag time in tool support. The majority of video is still in the aforementioned two codecs. I'm afraid there is a large transcode process required somewhere down the line whatever future direction they go in.

Sorry, but no and it doesn't create a rationale for h.264 simply being the path of least resistance either.

Edited 2010-05-02 23:04 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2