Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Apr 2010 21:40 UTC, submitted by Helge
Thread beginning with comment 422301
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Flash for Future?
by segedunum on Sun 2nd May 2010 23:03
in reply to "RE[7]: Flash for Future?"
Except a large percentage web video is YouTube, and YouTube's vids are all H.264.
They're not. h.264 support in Flash players was only added around 2007 and the original format might not even be h.264, quite apart from the lag time in tool support. The majority of video is still in the aforementioned two codecs. I'm afraid there is a large transcode process required somewhere down the line whatever future direction they go in.
Sorry, but no and it doesn't create a rationale for h.264 simply being the path of least resistance either.
Edited 2010-05-02 23:04 UTC
RE[9]: Flash for Future?
by bhtooefr on Sun 2nd May 2010 23:05
in reply to "RE[8]: Flash for Future?"





Member since:
2009-02-19
Except a large percentage web video is YouTube, and YouTube's vids are all H.264.