Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...
UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.
UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.
Thread beginning with comment 422389
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2010-05-03
You also seem to be entirely lacking in reading comprehension, as not one of these links has anything at all to do with the fact that Theora's quality is horrendous. Being able to pick whatever codec a given browser happens to support doesn't change this. Did you even see the link earlier in the thread?
http://saintdevelopment.com/media/
(There's a reason the x264 folks use Touhou for encoding tests (beyond liking mediocre shooters--go play Mars Matrix): high motion, chroma and luma variation, large static areas, sharp/well-defined borders, etc.)