Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd May 2010 13:47 UTC, submitted by Andreas Andersen
Thread beginning with comment 422416
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
-Semantic autocompletion
If qt creator doesn't have semantic autocompletion, what does it have instead? Do you have an example of what kdevelop can complete, and qt creator cannot?
It completes pretty much everything for me (and has more "convenience" completions than most, like #include completion, signature completion for function definitions in cpp files, signal/slot completion...)
No, it does not, not that way, at least. UML in visual studio was pushed in Visio the last time I checked, it was not native and interactive.
Completion is not there at all, it's not in the same league, end of the line.
Syntax highlighting in VS is not better than Notepad++ (last time I checked was VS.Net 2008, I have not tried 2010 yet)
And the documentation in KDevelop is integrated in the completion, not only the header and doxygen @name, the whole doc.





Member since:
2006-06-12
-Semantic highlightning
-Semantic autocompletion
-Documentation integrated in autocompletion (in a better way)
-It generate graphics and UML on the fly
Those features are quite unique, MSVC++ and Eclipse look outdated when you code in KDevelop. As for QtCreator, it is a good little IDE, but not a fully featured one. I most admit that I still code in Kate because of the stability, even if QtCreator is getting there.