Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd May 2010 13:47 UTC, submitted by Andreas Andersen
Thread beginning with comment 422601
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I believe people say that because they haven't tried Qt. They miss the easy-to-use libraries of Java/Python/C#, and blame C++ the language for whatever bad library they have been using previously.
You are mostly right: QT is a very good api (we are switching from MFC
), and it makes it easy for both java and MFC programmers to work with it, after a short accommodation. But the flexibility and c heritage makes it worst actually. This should not be a problem however if you use it properly (as a OOP language).




Member since:
2008-12-26
I believe people say that because they haven't tried Qt. They miss the easy-to-use libraries of Java/Python/C#, and blame C++ the language for whatever bad library they have been using previously.