Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 9th May 2010 12:34 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Dear Ubuntu, for the last couple years life has been good. Every time I've shown you to a friend or family member, they've compared you to what they're familiar with--Windows XP or Vista, mostly--and by comparison you've looked brilliant. Yeah, your ugly brown color scheme was a bit off-putting at first, but once people saw how secure, simple, and reliable you were, the response was almost universally positive. But recently, things have changed ..."
Thread beginning with comment 423366
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Worthless
by OSNevvs on Sun 9th May 2010 13:39 UTC in reply to "Worthless"
OSNevvs
Member since:
2009-08-20

Same feeling here. I think Ubuntu Lucid Lynx is very good. It's as good as W7, and you could even add that it's more secure. How is W7 better, to begin with? Also, is W7 really better than Vista? When I upgraded from Vista to W7, I didn't see any difference beside the task bar and the new wallpaper...

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Worthless
by Lennie on Sun 9th May 2010 13:54 in reply to "RE: Worthless"
Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

I guess the only real improvement in Windows 7 is performance. Compatibility is also better then when Vista came out, but that's just because everything that wasn't compatible slowly became Vista compatible and automatically Windows 7 compatible as well.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Worthless
by Morgan on Sun 9th May 2010 14:31 in reply to "RE: Worthless"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

Same feeling here. I think Ubuntu Lucid Lynx is very good. It's as good as W7, and you could even add that it's more secure.


I would tend to agree with you here; as great as Windows 7 was in my nearly 10 months evaluating it, Ubuntu is still a better fit for me. Granted, if I bought a new computer with 7 pre-installed I wouldn't remove it, but I don't foresee me buying a copy of 7.

How is W7 better, to begin with? Also, is W7 really better than Vista? When I upgraded from Vista to W7, I didn't see any difference beside the task bar and the new wallpaper...


I can't speak for everyone, but I've noticed major differences between the two, mostly under the hood. Remember, the UI is only a small fraction of a modern OS. On my test computer, Vista was dog-slow and had some stability issues. This was with SP1. With the Windows 7 Beta and RC, my system was much faster and more stable. The only issues I had with 7 was an incomplete bluetooth stack and driver support for a 10-year-old MP3 player. Even XP had issues with that device.

Another example: A family member bought a top-of-the-line computer with Vista a couple of years ago. The specs of the machine were amazing for the time, and still competitive today, but she was constantly frustrated with the slowness and instability of Vista. Once 7 was released to retail, I suggested she give it a try. Another family member bought her the copy and I installed and tweaked it to her preferences. She was absolutely floored by the difference; she now has a pleasant experience every time she uses her computer, as opposed to the constant frustration under Vista.

Again, I wouldn't run 7 as a main OS unless my computer came with it preinstalled, and even then I'd run Ubuntu and Haiku side-by-side with it. But it's only the second version of Windows I can faithfully say I really like (Win2K being the other one). Microsoft finally got it right, in my eyes.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: Worthless
by nt_jerkface on Sun 9th May 2010 23:39 in reply to "RE[2]: Worthless"
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

A family member bought a top-of-the-line computer with Vista a couple of years ago. The specs of the machine were amazing for the time, and still competitive today, but she was constantly frustrated with the slowness and instability of Vista.


She probably had junk running in the background or hadn't updated the system past SP1.

Windows 7 is a little better for older machines but on something new there is really no difference. I have machines with XP, Vista and 7 and my opinion is that upgrading from Vista to 7 is a waste of money unless you are running an older single core machine. There are plenty of benchmarks that support this assertion. Upgrading from XP is worth it though for the security and aesthetic improvements.

Speaking of Vista the screenshot on that post is clearly Vista and not 7. Not only does it have the older taskbar but the root drive in the explorer Window is labeled Vista. That blogger has zero experience running Vista or 7 and is not in a position to make comparisons. This story should be removed.

Reply Parent Score: 2