Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 9th May 2010 12:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 423369
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Explain why Vista is shit, and please be specific as in show me benchmarks.
Why does shit have do be benchmarked? Do you really really take a dump in a test tube and perform tests on it to prove its worth (or worthlessness)? Shit is shit. It all stinks, and it's all waste.
Joking, of course. Well, kind of. But I do agree with the original poster that Vista is shit. No need for proof, my own experiences have formed my opinion. Which is just that--an opinion. And since when did an opinion need to be proven as fact?
IMO, Vista is the biggest Windows dud since WinME. While WinME was a buggy, bloated and highly unstable POS, at least Vista is more stable, but its GUI consistency is horrible. Vista is still bloated though (which Win7 improved), and it was released with bad device compatibility (few working drivers).
Edited 2010-05-10 03:04 UTC





Member since:
2009-09-28
yes friend you are right but seriously, windows 7 more secure than linux?
please don't say bullshit http://www.secureworks.com/research/threats/zeus/ ( watch the paragraph Windows 7/Vista Support $2000 )
UAC is a very superficial imitation of the sudoing mechanism
yes windows 7 is better than vista, but, hey, vista is plain simple shit
it is so easy to be better than vista
so what is the point of the article? ubuntu and/or linux is becoming uglier? less secure? I don't see this trend happening