Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 9th May 2010 12:34 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Dear Ubuntu, for the last couple years life has been good. Every time I've shown you to a friend or family member, they've compared you to what they're familiar with--Windows XP or Vista, mostly--and by comparison you've looked brilliant. Yeah, your ugly brown color scheme was a bit off-putting at first, but once people saw how secure, simple, and reliable you were, the response was almost universally positive. But recently, things have changed ..."
Thread beginning with comment 423371
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ubuntu & 7
by marktn on Sun 9th May 2010 14:12 UTC
marktn
Member since:
2009-10-06

Am I alone in finding the Windows vs. OS X vs. Linux debates about as meaningful as the Kirk vs. Picard vs. Sisco debates?

When it comes down to it, I'm betting a fair amount of semi-competent computer users in the world are going to rely on what system works best for their needs. If I'm doing graphic design or video editing I'm probably going to use a Mac. If I'm running financial software or nearly anything in an office environment, then Windows 7. At home, if my only needs are browsing the web, watching Youtube and Colbert, then Linux. I'd throw in video game playing for Windows, but most folks are offloading their game playing onto game consoles these days.

For me, this means most of my time is spent in Windows 7. I'll use Linux for applications that I simply can't afford to purchase for Windows, such as GIS software. Ubuntu's (and Debian's) lack of support for QGIS for some time meant my Ubuntu days were over a couple years ago (although I do understand the fault was the devs at QGIS for producing some darned buggy releases after 1.0).

With support for QGIS renewed and reportedly working well, I installed 10.10 last week. I uninstalled it after three days -- my laptop's ability to detect wifi networks and its battery life were significantly reduced versus Windows 7, my fingerprint reader wasn't recognized, packages would install but not appear on my applications menu, and most annoying of all, suspend/hibernate resulted in a frozen computer -- all on one of those rare, no-one-ever-uses brands called a Lenovo Thinkpad.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Ubuntu & 7
by darknexus on Sun 9th May 2010 14:18 in reply to "Ubuntu & 7"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

Sure the os debates are meaningless. But on the other hand, sometimes they're just too entertaining the pass by. IN the end, I think we should concentrate on open data formats, and thus render the choice of os a lot less meaningful than the choice of an interoperable way to send and receive all information.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE: Ubuntu & 7
by REM2000 on Sun 9th May 2010 15:52 in reply to "Ubuntu & 7"
REM2000 Member since:
2006-07-25

i wouldnt say the debate is pointless, we have had a single OS dominating the computing world for a great many years. Now we finally start to see the tide turning, i think the debates are useful as a method of informing users.

Someone using windows might hear the word linux / ubuntu / fedore / mac OSX on the tv/at work. They go home and do a search in google and find the article and the comments we leave here. Reading the comments might open them up to trying out ubuntu, to think about a mac.

I agree with Kroc's comment earlier, it's great to have the level of competition, i just hope it continues, its great to have choice and it's great to see Microsoft and everyone else working hard on creating some great products instead of falling into lethargy.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Ubuntu & 7
by phoenix on Mon 10th May 2010 02:35 in reply to "Ubuntu & 7"
phoenix Member since:
2005-07-11

Am I alone in finding the Windows vs. OS X vs. Linux debates about as meaningful as the Kirk vs. Picard vs. Sisco debates?


Well, you can't really bring Sisco or Janeway into a debate about who was the better captain of the Enterprise. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 3