Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th May 2010 23:11 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces Ah, Jakob Nielsen. Anyone who has ever been involved with serious document design or web usability will know his name. If you've never heard of him, the best way to describe him would probably be this: he's the Richard Stallman of usability. He has a set of very clear ideas about user interface and document design, which more often than not get in the way of beauty. He has performed a usability study, with real users, on the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 423960
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: It'll get better with time
by JAlexoid on Wed 12th May 2010 09:59 UTC in reply to "It'll get better with time"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

The iPad is a new device and offers a new way of interacting with it. As such I think there'll be a lot of experimentation as developers figure out what works and what doesn't.

I remember on the Amiga many years ago the lack of guidelines lead to a lot of software with weird and wonderful UIs. A lot of this was bad, but there were also gems where the UI was amazingly good. I suspect the same will happen here.

I initially wasn't interested in getting an iPad (I seen it's benefit immediately but I also saw that it was not targeted at me). I've since thought of an idea for an app (with an interesting UI) so I've ordered one.

However it's only one aspect of the UI I want to make "interesting", for the rest, guidelines like these are very useful.

Yet, most of the issues are carried over from iPhone. And iPhone is 3 years old.

PS: The inconsistent back button, is the thing I hate the most about iPhone OS(there is nothing more annoying) and love the consistency that Android phones give there.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Chicken Blood Member since:
2005-12-21


PS: The inconsistent back button, is the thing I hate the most about iPhone OS(there is nothing more annoying) and love the consistency that Android phones give there.


Hmm, I used an Android Nexus one and a Backflip and there was nothing consistent about any of the apps. In particular, the photo Gallery app did not have clearly labelled exits (back buttons).

The thing is, it's really up to the developer to do the right thing. Many iPhone apps *are* consistent in this regards. The UIViewController navigation model even provides a firm foundation for putting breadcrumbs and back buttons into your app easily.

Edited 2010-05-12 22:51 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

Hmm, I used an Android Nexus one and a Backflip and there was nothing consistent about any of the apps. In particular, the photo Gallery app did not have clearly labelled exits (back buttons).


Now look at the hypocrisy. Not a single standard app in the iPhone OS comes with a close button. You have to press the home button to exit, back buttons are also not everywhere clearly defined as back.

Furthermore, you expect the device to work in the same way as iPhone(I will try to use my telepathy... You own an iPhone. Did I get it right?)

I got my iPod touch 3 weeks before I got my first Android phone(N1), therefore I will claim that I have less predisposition to a certain paradigm(be it iPhone's or Android's).


The thing is, it's really up to the developer to do the right thing. Many iPhone apps *are* consistent in this regards. The UIViewController navigation model even provides a firm foundation for putting breadcrumbs and back buttons into your app easily.


On Android phones, the back button IS the back button. Period. Only games override it(as far as I've noticed). On iPhone OS with most apps, you get to wonder how to return or look around to see where did they put that Cancel/Close/Back button.

Edited 2010-05-13 14:26 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3