Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th May 2010 15:41 UTC
Microsoft The Microsoft empire is built upon two pillars: the Windows operating system, and Microsoft Office. Windows 7 made its way unto the scene last year, and now it's time to work on the other pillar. Today, Microsoft officially launched Microsoft Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010. Regular customers will be able to purchase the new versions next month, starting at 119 USD.
Thread beginning with comment 424081
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

Much as I hate the ribbon, how long would you have Microsoft hold on if they wish to move forward? I don't agree with their UI direction, but I'll give them props for actually trying something new. We all complain that Microsoft holds too tightly to backward compatibility. Well, we can't have it both ways. Either they hold on, or they move forward. Two UIs means more code to maintain, more bugs, more bloat... and Office is buggy and bloated enough as it is and keeps getting bigger with each version it seems.
I think 2000 was Microsoft's magic number. Windows 2000 rocked, and Office 2000 was awesome. It's a pity they haven't been able to move forward without creeping featurism.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Phloptical Member since:
2006-10-10

The inclusion of an alternate toolbar theme represents backward thinking? Why is the ribbon UI better? What does it offer to the end user, other than more phone calls to me all day when they have to hunt and dig for the pivot table field list in Excel?

Is the classic theme as an option really an impedance to "the way forward"? All the Ribbon represents, is Microsoft taking a page out of Apple's sanctimonious UI design doctrine. And also, why is the classic theme (to some degree) still offered in the OS and not in the Office package?

For the record, I don't mind the Ribbon. But then again, I don't perform advanced functions in Office, nor do I consider myself to be a "Power User", nor does my job require me to perform tasks in Office quickly.

Reply Parent Score: 3

darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

Look, I'm not arguing about the ribbon itself. I despise it personally. But you're talking about a lot more than a theme here. You said the classic UI. That means toolbars, menu bar, and everything related to it. A theme is one thing, maintaining two separate UIs is another and would be a recipe for disaster when Microsoft clearly doesn't care about the classic UI anymore.

Reply Parent Score: 2

MollyC Member since:
2006-07-04

The old UI is already way over burdened. Keeping it around as an option would entail having to cram even more things into that already over-burdened UI as more features are added. And those features would be hidden from the user, as they'd be buried in that byzantine UI, and things would simply get worse and worse with each subsequent release.

Also, there's something to be said for forcing the users to move on to the new UI. If the old one were available as an option, lots of people would simply use that out of force of habit, even if they would've found the new UI to be way better. Which would lead back to my first point.

Maybe you should read some entries on the excellent blog of Jensen Harris, starting with this one:
http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2008/03/12/the-story-of-the-r...

It'll show how the old UI simply could not be scaled any further. New features crammed into it were hidden from the user. Menus, toolbars, task panes, etc. Something needed to be done. And a clean break was best.

Reply Parent Score: 2

JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

We all complain that Microsoft holds too tightly to backward compatibility

They have backwards compatibility in Office!?!?!?! News to me!!!
OpenOffice has more backwards compatibility for Microsoft Office, than Microsoft Office...

Reply Parent Score: 3

Gone fishing Member since:
2006-02-22

I have to agree I think Office 2000 is the best. I still use it However, its getting old now bits of it do not work nicely with Vista (uggh feels slightly nauseous) or Windows 7 and I guess this will get worse.

I need Access and am considering an upgrade, but the vast expense and that utterly vile, counterintuitive, ribbon interface really puts me off.

Maybe I need to learn a new database app.

Reply Parent Score: 2