Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th May 2010 18:39 UTC, submitted by hotice
Thread beginning with comment 424249
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com
by Delgarde on Thu 13th May 2010 21:32
in reply to "RE: Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com"
Are they so difficult? The way desktops work where like I assumed they work when I first was introduced to virtual desktops in 1998/1999 on KDE 1 (I think it was KDE 1). It caused me some confusion until I've understood how they really work(ed).
The idea of virtual desktops isn't difficult, but can be hard for some people to visualise. They might be drawn side-by-side in a pager,but when you switch desktops, everything just vanishes, replaced by something else - there's no sense that you're moving somewhere.
Providing a visual transition makes them a lot easier to grasp - things like the Compiz cube, or having one desktop slide of the edge of the monitor.
RE[3]: Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com
by sorpigal on Fri 14th May 2010 13:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com"





Member since:
2006-01-22
Are they so difficult? The way desktops work where like I assumed they work when I first was introduced to virtual desktops in 1998/1999 on KDE 1 (I think it was KDE 1). It caused me some confusion until I've understood how they really work(ed).