Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th May 2010 18:39 UTC, submitted by hotice
Thread beginning with comment 424339
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops"
by sorpigal on Fri 14th May 2010 13:42
in reply to "RE: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops""
not everyone needs "virtual desktops"
I disagree. People don't know they need them. They're like tabbed browsing: until you use it you don't know what you're missing. Maybe tabs aren't right for all situations and all people, but like virtual desktops they're an essential tool everyone should have available.
RE[3]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops"
by phoenix on Sat 15th May 2010 13:15
in reply to "RE[2]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops""
I've tried them a few times, but never could figure out why it was any better than multiple monitors and a good taskbar/task manager. Maybe I'm not using them "right" or maybe I've never been shown how to use them "right".
Then again, I tend to work with maximised windows, and tabbed interfaces (Firefox, Chrome, Konsole, KRDC, Kate, etc).
RE[2]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops"
by Soulbender on Fri 14th May 2010 15:48
in reply to "RE: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops""
Actually, Windows XP and later have virtual desktops built-in. Sysinternals has a very nice little tool for using them.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc817881.aspx
Edited 2010-05-14 15:49 UTC
RE[3]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops"
by Soulbender on Mon 17th May 2010 02:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Didn't know about Virtual Desktops""





Member since:
2005-07-06
windows doesnt have it built in, but you can easily bolt it on.

And not everyone needs "virtual desktops". Of limited use to someone that only surfs the web, does email, and IMs