Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 10th Oct 2005 01:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 42455
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Isn't this the DBAs job, to make sure that the database schema is kept clean?
This is why if there must be a DBA they must to be part of the DEVELOPMENT team and go to the development meetings, etc. Let IT do backups and restore. It is THE reason that you are having trouble with _those_ developers. Your organization does not know which side of the fence you should be on.
Most DBAs discover, though, that there is more power and money in claiming databases and whining about developers. It is way too common.






Member since:
Why bother to understand a schema. Just add fields and tables as you desire. Why bother to think about the long term usability of the schema when adding this field here and that field there and this table here and that table there will make the code work today.
Geeze the db runs slow. instead of figuring out the problems, lets create a table but only have a subset of the data so the query goes fast. Then lets create 3 or 4 duplications of the data throughout the database so that when Bob's query runs we get one result set and when Janes runs we get another. Then what the f*ck is the DBA doing that we have such wierd results.
Geeze I cannot put this crap data into these fields, I'll just drop the foreign keys and now it works. One bug fixed.
Views indexes, we don't need no stinkin' performance and nomalization.
mark mcginnis