Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424604
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yeah right.
When did Ubuntu start using Grub 2?
When did Fedora start using Grub 2?
F12 certainly does not.
From a recent LUG problem report, it appears that 9.10 does and it appears that quote a lot of people are really having fun (not) with it.
IMHO (Which might be wrong) it seems that Canonical are a little more 'gun-ho' with stuff that is not quite ready for 'prime time' so to speak than Fedora. Given the higher usage of Ubuntu, I'm not convinced that this is all together a good thing.
I'm hoping the F13 is pretty stable as my guess is that a lot of it will be used in RHEL 6 later this year.
Just my 2p worth on the subject.





Member since:
2010-02-16
You make it sound as if that's set in stone. Both are FOSS. Grub2 can be modified to understand Btrfs.
The more important question is: Are Canonical for a change willing to do this by themselves?
Given Canonical's track record, I guess they're waiting for Red Hat to do this in time for them (which already doesn't work out for the Nouveau 3D drivers, because Fedora 14 will be released 1 month after Ubuntu 10.10 and adopting a driver that's even beta by Fedora's bleeding edge standards is not something Canonical will do).
That said, I'm hoping that I get positively surprised by Canonical, though my hopes for that aren't high.