Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Yeah right.
When did Ubuntu start using Grub 2?
When did Ubuntu start using Grub 2?
I believe it was Ubuntu 9.10 where Grub 2 was first time default for all new installations. "
Confirmed. I remember when I installed ubuntu 9.10, made wi-fi work by downloading and compiling a non-broken package from linuxwireless.org using a separate computer running windows, discovered that there was still no sound after updating everything, said "oh, well, that's why I install ubuntu releases on a separate partition after all", tried to modify GRUB settings in order to make it target my "old" 9.04 partition, and discovered some strange config file in a syntax which I didn't know of with a big warning on top of it telling me not to edit it.
9.04 used GRUB Legacy, hence GRUB 2 appeared with 9.10.
Edited 2010-05-16 07:42 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-22
Yeah right.
When did Ubuntu start using Grub 2?
When did Fedora start using Grub 2?
F12 certainly does not.
From a recent LUG problem report, it appears that 9.10 does and it appears that quote a lot of people are really having fun (not) with it.
IMHO (Which might be wrong) it seems that Canonical are a little more 'gun-ho' with stuff that is not quite ready for 'prime time' so to speak than Fedora. Given the higher usage of Ubuntu, I'm not convinced that this is all together a good thing.
I'm hoping the F13 is pretty stable as my guess is that a lot of it will be used in RHEL 6 later this year.
Just my 2p worth on the subject.