Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th May 2010 19:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424718
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
I tend to agree that the OS world is forming into a few big camps rather than a bunch of little camps. Probably because making an OS now that'll do everything WinOSXLinux does is a huge task. 15 or 20 years ago, prior to the big Windows push, when DOS was still a common operating system, it was relatively easy for a small team to put together a good enough operating system.
Now, an OS has to be multi-user, multi-tasking, multi-arch with a desktop and web browser to get passing notice. That's a giant task for a small group of developers.
Though I would like to add I think the BSDs shouldn't be counted out. FreeBSD especially (via the PC-BSD project) is a solid system that will probably become steadily more popular.