Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th May 2010 18:39 UTC, submitted by hotice
Gnome The problem with just about every virtual desktop implementation is just that - they're virtual. This means that beyond the ability to move windows to specific desktops, you're still looking at exactly the same desktop, no matter what virtual desktop number you switched to. A mockup for GNOME Shell is trying to take the virtual out of virtual desktop.
Thread beginning with comment 424732
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Multiple vs Virtual
by siride on Sat 15th May 2010 21:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Multiple vs Virtual"
siride
Member since:
2006-01-02

But there really is no salient difference between your definitions, other than one specific feature (a way of moving windows between desktops, and not the only one in either system).

I'm not questioning your desire for that behavior, I'm questioning your terminology and categorization of technology. There is no difference between multiple and virtual desktops for all intents and purposes. What you really wanted to rant about was those implementations which lack a user-friendly way to move windows between the desktop(lets).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Multiple vs Virtual
by sorpigal on Sat 15th May 2010 21:53 in reply to "RE[3]: Multiple vs Virtual"
sorpigal Member since:
2005-11-02

There is no difference between multiple and virtual desktops for all intents and purposes.


Except that there is an important difference, so your premise is incorrect and your conclusion flawed.

Reply Parent Score: 2