Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424763
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I should note that Canonical has more than 300 employees. Not 100.
http://www.linkedin.com/companies/canonical-ltd
Not sure of the organization split of developers vs others but you can make rough estimates




Member since:
2010-02-16
Learn to read. Nobody wrote that Ubuntu is based on Fedora. Ubuntu uses specific features from Fedora (like Plymouth). Many features Ubuntu uses may be in default Debian, but are primarily developed by Red Hat with Fedora in mind: For example Red Hat tries to make Nouveau 3D "good enough" for compositing window managers in Fedora 14.
As Fedora is always released ~1 month after Ubuntu, that's too late for Ubuntu 10.10.
Even with smaller financial resources, Canonical could assign a developer to also work on Nouveau and finish that work a month earlier in time for 10.10. Canonical does not do that. Canonical employs people but only very, very few of them participate in upstream FOSS projects.
Comparing the work force, Mandriva and Canonical are roughly equal in size (~100 employees), but despite Canonical's much deeper pockets, Mandriva is ahead of Canonical in every FOSS contributions statistic I know.
Apple (co-)develops WebKit, CUPS, GCC, LLVM, and much more. Strange that a "closed-source proprietary company" contributes much more to FOSS than Canonical...
Stop spamming.