Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "UDS is over! And in the customary wrap-up I stood up and told the audience what the Foundations team have been discussing all week. One of the items is almost certainly going to get a little bit of publicity. We are going to be doing the work to have btrfs as an installation option, and we have not ruled out making it the default. I do stress the emphasis of that statement, a number of things would have to be true for us to take that decision."
Thread beginning with comment 424869
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by bsharitt
by Kebabbert on Sun 16th May 2010 12:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by bsharitt"
Kebabbert
Member since:
2007-07-27

I dont think you should focus on performance. Is your data safe with XFS, ext4, etc? No. Read these PhD thesis and research papers:




XFS is not safe against data corruption:
http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~vshree/xfs.pdf




And neither is ext3, JFS, ReiserFS, etc:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/how-microsoft-puts-your-data-at-r...
"I came across the fascinating PhD thesis of Vijayan Prabhakaran, IRON File Systems which analyzes how five commodity journaling file systems - NTFS, ext3, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS - handle storage problems.

In a nutshell he found that the all the file systems have

. . . failure policies that are often inconsistent, sometimes buggy, and generally inadequate in their ability to recover from partial disk failures. "




But ZFS successfully protects your data. Here is an research paper on this:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/zfs-data-integrity-tested/811

Reply Parent Score: 2