Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 425005
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
For crying out loud, this is hard work!
Because you posted that quote in response to a comment someone made on here about BtrFS not being ready so I was making a point that you're post was no more helpful than the comment you were originally criticizing.
In fact, let's get back to the start (and with some heavy paraphrasing):
original comment: BtrFS isn't ready
your reply: someone told me it's more ready than Ext3 so your comments aren't helpful
my reply: care to elaborate or are you just going to leave us there with an equally unhelpful post?
your reply: it's all in the link. I'm not going to help beyond that.
All I wanted was some data to back up the comments made. Something tangible and conclusive. Instead I've read nothing more than faceless techies arguing non-quantities.
</rant>
[edit]
I take that last part back: ggeldenhuys has provided some real figures and studies.
Thank you ggeldenhuys
Edited 2010-05-16 22:14 UTC