Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426148
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yeah, and what's the point of comparing at bitrates high enough to make them indistinguishable?
If we go to a high enough bitrate (as lemur2 did) then Theora will become indistinguishable too, but no-one would claim it is as good as x264.
I demand lower bitrate, non-HD tests! Something like DVD resolution, at 350 MB/hour, to give a realistic example.
If we go to a high enough bitrate (as lemur2 did) then Theora will become indistinguishable too
I compared them at a lower bitrate than this page indictaed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_rate#Video
Theora is close in quality to h.264 at bitrates appropriate for the quality and resolution level, as indicated by this table, and even quite a bit lower bitrates.




Member since:
2009-10-04
I don't know anything about this "Squeeze" encoder, but I'm guessing it's not really as good as x264.
There is really no point in comparing anything to H.264 if you're not using x264 (in the same way that if you are comparing something to Theora, you really should use Ptalarbvorm, or at least Thusnelda).
My guess is that x264 will beat VP8, but the difference will be small, and VP8 will be perfectly suitable for web video.
Edited 2010-05-23 11:10 UTC