Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Benchmarks Now that Google has opened up VP8, the big question is obviously how it'll hold up to H264. Of course, VP8 already wins by default because it's open source and royalty free, but that doesn't mean we should neglect the quality issue. Jan Ozer from has put up an article comparing the two codecs, and concludes that the differences are negligible - in fact, only in some high-motion videos did H264 win out. As always, this is just one comparison and most certainly anything but conclusive. Update: Another comparison. I can't spot the difference, but then again, I'm no expert.
Thread beginning with comment 426199
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Neolander on Sun 23rd May 2010 17:40 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
Member since:

I think you should compare gif to png. That's more inline with the usage pattern.

Yes, but as far as I know PNG did not exist at that time. GIF was a superior format on the 256-color screens in term of compression vs image quality, but JPEG was safer.

(True, PNG beats them all, I use this format for just about everything which doesn't require layers or animation ^^ But at the time, there was a compromise about compression quality vs licensing quality)

Edited 2010-05-23 17:45 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Timmmm on Sun 23rd May 2010 18:45 in reply to "RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
Timmmm Member since:

No, GIF and PNG are good for encoding diagram-like images. JPEG is for photos, which GIF is terrible at.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Lennie on Sun 23rd May 2010 20:16 in reply to "RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
Lennie Member since:

It did exist for part of that time, but wasn't widely used. But yeah, you are right ofcourse.

Reply Parent Score: 2