Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Benchmarks Now that Google has opened up VP8, the big question is obviously how it'll hold up to H264. Of course, VP8 already wins by default because it's open source and royalty free, but that doesn't mean we should neglect the quality issue. Jan Ozer from StreamingMedia.com has put up an article comparing the two codecs, and concludes that the differences are negligible - in fact, only in some high-motion videos did H264 win out. As always, this is just one comparison and most certainly anything but conclusive. Update: Another comparison. I can't spot the difference, but then again, I'm no expert.
Thread beginning with comment 426207
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26


I think if they do drop a format it'll be carefully done. When they have some way to guarantee they can keep viewers. Maybe if they could update Youtube app to include the VP8 and WebM built in.


Dropping H.264 would mean that the youtube button on idevices would no longer work. Apple could roll out an update that links it to a new VP8 app but they sure as hell wouldn't be happy about it and there would still be the hardware decoding issue.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Radio Member since:
2009-06-20

As the x264 dev snarked on how VP8 is similar to h264, it shouldn't be too hacky to make those hardware decoders chew through VP8.

Reply Parent Score: 2

nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

As the x264 dev snarked on how VP8 is similar to h264, it shouldn't be too hacky to make those hardware decoders chew through VP8.


Changing new models is one thing but most devices in the wild have hardware decoders that can't be updated.

But as they say you can't make an omelet without cracking a few eggs.

Reply Parent Score: 1