Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426319
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-19
When I was looking at the linked page, it already contained comparisson to x264, and the images could be clicked to open the full resolution version. My monitor happens to be 1920x1200 and with my browser fullscreen, I can look at them unscaled. Loading them in two separate tabs, I can flip forth and back.
With the bee, I agree the difference is almost not noticable, I think x264 has less block artifacts, the gradients are somewhat smoother.
However with park scene, I have to say the difference is staggering. x264 is playing in a whole different league. There is soo much more detail in all the plants and suroundings. I really wonder how someone would not notice it.