To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Indigo = Webobjects
Avalon = InterfaceBuilder
Both have been around for a very long time. Of course if you mean "OSX doesn't" in the terms of .NET integration, you're right, but why would you want that if you weren't developing on/for a MS platform?
Avalon will be nothing more than a gussied up window designer ala VS.NET's dialog editor, except with 5000 more options, and much more arcane xml syntax to go along with it.
And of course, it will be in all managed code rather than native (like WO and IB/Xcode). A true accomplishment.
Indigo is basically an API to generate web service applications. Its basically the next incarnation of Web Services in the .Net Framework.
From Microsoft:
Advanced Web services support in Indigo provides secure, reliable, and transacted messaging along with interoperability. Indigo's service-oriented programming model is built on the Microsoft .NET Framework and simplifies development of connected systems. Indigo unifies a broad array of distributed systems capabilities in a composable and extensible architecture, spanning transports, security systems, messaging patterns, encodings, network topologies and hosting models. Indigo will be available for Windows "Longhorn" as well as for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.
See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/Longhorn/understanding/pillars/Indigo/def...
I've been using Indigo for a while now; having been exposed to WebObjects in the past I can safely say that Indigo is much broader and deeper in scope than WebObjects. Indigo is much more than web services; it's a fully managed library that wraps up MSMQ, Remoting, Web Services, Sockets, and some aspects of COM+ into a single unified programming interface/API rather than the disparate namespace mess we have now. It's pretty impressive actually. Of course it won't have much impact on a normal home user, but from a development standpoint it's a godsend (for .Net at least); businesses will gain a lot from this.





Member since:
2005-07-09
I don't think you understand perfectly. Longhorn will do much more than OSX. Does OSX have something like Avalon? No. How about something like Indigo? No. Those are two huge things Longhorn has that OSX doesn't. And there are many more little things.