Linked by David Adams on Tue 25th May 2010 04:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426576
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-22
Aside from the obvious fact that we all have different requirements, taste, and budget, we are witnessing a clash of two philosophies.
One would have you believe that buying something doesn't equate to owning the very thing that you bought. And furthermore threatens to send you to jail if you "lift the hood and tinker with the engine", all the while making sure that you have no say, or choice on what you can use to add functionality (if you are allowed to do that at the first place). All this accompanied with a propaganda blitz about a supposedly great design (if you are a design freak then maybe you should look at P9522), a design which leaves me completely flat (I don't even dislike the device just ... flat, nada) and huge inovation.
The other is just trying to kill this model, by offering an alternative so that it can continue to be a relevant factor.
Reminds me of the MS vs Apple approach, with an added twist. Take a guess at which side I've picked