Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th May 2010 21:10 UTC, submitted by asupcb
Thread beginning with comment 426620
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
It depends what you call an interface. But if we're talking about operating for computers, and not for computers + windows + IE (replace by your combo of choice), then EyeOS is not an operating system.
Again, you're being imprecise. It depends what is your point of view. For an user, it does not. For the developper of the operating system, it didn't until... say... the Amiga days maybe ? All modern operating systems are made of several parts that are developped separately, because it allows work paralelization and much, much better debugging and bug tracking.
Yes it is. And it is part of the OS. But it's not a computer OS.
For the third time, aren't we talking about computer operating systems here ? Duh, even if Microsoft would like to, Windows is not part of the computer at the moment. Only apple manages to do the trick by calling the computer+OS bundle a Macintosh and suing everyone trying to use a legally bought copy of their computer OS on other computers, but the distinction is pure marketting.
It's highly debatable. Both are, from a computer OS point of view, just some user application... That's where the editor's opinion becomes useful
Edited 2010-05-26 09:59 UTC