Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th May 2010 21:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426643
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
I get the feeling it's more about good PR. The chinese governemnt, like most, ask for top level SSL certs which would allow them to sniff your SSL connection. If your selling encryption to chineses buyers, you'll need to hand over decryption keys; again, not different from other governments. Based on the theory that PRC can already open Google's SSL traffic, I see it giving them more ROI from good PR. With several slippups in the last few months, I'm thinking it's more about company image.
Still, it's another encrypted protocol where a cleartext should have been replaced long ago so I'm not complaining; another domain goes into my auto-https plugin.