Linked by JRepin on Wed 26th May 2010 18:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426807
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: WARNING: Personal opinion contained within
by vermaden on Thu 27th May 2010 12:28
in reply to "WARNING: Personal opinion contained within"
* FreeBSD's ZFS support was still only classed as "experimental" plus there seemed to be little in the way of virtulisation solutions for AMD64 (if I'm wrong about these points, please correct me)
* and Linux (ZFS-FUSE) did little to reassure me either.
* and Linux (ZFS-FUSE) did little to reassure me either.
ZFS in FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE (v13) is marked as production ready, and on amd64 does not require any additional tuning with 2GB or more RAM. You may of course use i386, but kernel recompile can be required to increase some kernel memory limits, besides that a lot of people reported that it works flawlessly now.
Even more ZFS 'upgrades/updates' has been added to, what it will be 8.1-RELEASE (will be released somewhere in July).
I use ZFS on my FreeBSD box without any issues or panics, uptime very healthy, system reboots only when I tell him to do so.
Current version in 8-STABLE/9-CURRENT tree is ZFS v14, but there were already some works on side source tree to have deduplication working with ZFS v24 on FreeBSD 9-CURRENT, here:
http://freebsd.org/news/status/report-2010-01-2010-03.html#ZFS
RE[2]: WARNING: Personal opinion contained within
by Laurence on Thu 27th May 2010 12:55
in reply to "RE: WARNING: Personal opinion contained within"






Member since:
2007-03-26
I pretty much hated OpenSolaris from the start.
It felt slow, buggy, bloated and the package manager just felt a step backwards from what I was used to (I even preferred FreeBSD ports).
However, I ended up being lumped with OpenSolaris as I wanted a ZFS NAS which could also run virtual servers on top.
* NexentaCP 1 was buggy and VBox was so unstable it became unusable for more than 1 VM. (later versions might be OK, but I lost faith with them after it became clear that the Core range was just lip service to the open source community)
* FreeBSD's ZFS support was still only classed as "experimental" plus there seemed to be little in the way of virtulisation solutions for AMD64 (if I'm wrong about these points, please correct me)
* and Linux (ZFS-FUSE) did little to reassure me either.
So I've been running OpenSolaris for about 3 months now and it's starting to win me over. There's still a few niggles (mostly around SMB/CIFS hosting) but on the whole it seems pretty stable - if a little bloated for a NAS.