Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Jun 2010 21:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 427817
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
and can safely be called a fascist practice.
Disagreed. The nazis worked together with big corporations, but made sure that national and corporate interests were aligned, so that the common people would benefit. (A car for each German.) I know, the line dividing these concepts is thin, but in the case of ACTA, government is not so much defending the common good but more defending good old corporate friends.
"and can safely be called a fascist practice.
Disagreed. The nazis worked together with big corporations, but made sure that national and corporate interests were aligned, so that the common people would benefit. (A car for each German.) I know, the line dividing these concepts is thin, but in the case of ACTA, government is not so much defending the common good but more defending good old corporate friends. "
Disregarding the fact that fascism and nazism are two different things, you fail to realize that the only thing that "national and corporate interests were aligned" to was the best of the Führer's interest ... who was the incarnation of the National Socialist fatherland and _only_then_ it became the best interest of the common people. Letting alone the fact that that was the same common people (civilians) he send to death when Berlin fell.
In the National Socialist ideal, there was _nothing_ above the Führer's best interest and everything else could be sacrified ... like Berlin's civil population was ... the Third Reich could lack everything, except: the Führer.
Edited 2010-06-03 14:07 UTC




Member since:
2006-08-17
and can safely be called a fascist practice.
Edited 2010-06-02 22:34 UTC