Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 10th Oct 2005 16:48 UTC, submitted by Shlomi Fish
Thread beginning with comment 42817
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: C and portability
by rayiner on Mon 10th Oct 2005 22:30
in reply to "RE[2]: C and portability"




Member since:
2005-07-06
As long as you are on a "c machine" and since Lisp machines seem to have dissappeared (physically speaking), I think you can be pretty sure you'll be on a "c machine."
Good Lisp implementations have existed for both Lisp machines and C machines. Good C implementations have never existed for a Lisp machine. What does that say about C's vaunted portability? You're basically saying: C is portable as long as you only try to port it to machines designed for C. Duh. Does that mean it is portable, or does that merely mean that it's so popular that most machines are designed for it?