Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Jun 2010 19:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 428654
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The point I made was that whilst it may be true that in the UK and the USA almost nobody makes 3G video calls, this is not universally true in every territory.
As I said in my post, people in Korea do use video calls on their phones. There's a lot of people in Korea. Apple even sells the iPhone there.
You kind of make my point. 3G video call support exists but isn't used by anyone, so why bother supporting an unused standard when you can support standards that are in large scale use across multiple platforms?
The world is bigger than the U.S. And the U.S. mobile arena hasn't exactly been a world leader technology-wise (let alone pricing &co. but that's another issue).
What does the U.S have to do with it? Name a country where 3G video calls are common place (you may have South Korea as has already been mentioned). Name all the countries with significant mobile phone infrastructure where they aren't. The latter will vastly outnumber the former. The networks across Europe paid large sums of money for 3G spectrum and tried to push video calls. They failed.




Member since:
2008-12-29
Shame that their video chat is incompatible with existing 3G video
Why?
You kind of make my point. 3G video call support exists but isn't used by anyone, so why bother supporting an unused standard when you can support standards that are in large scale use across multiple platforms?