Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 00:08 UTC
Microsoft It's late here, but we're having election night, and the two leading parties are currently tied seat-wise, with a 10000-vote difference. Anyway, it gives me some time to cover a major problem: Microsoft is at it again. The company has pushed an update through Windows Update which silently, without user consent, installs two browser extensions - one for Internet Explorer, and one for Firefox.
Thread beginning with comment 429377
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Conspiracy
by WereCatf on Thu 10th Jun 2010 05:44 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Conspiracy"
WereCatf
Member since:
2006-02-15

You are naive in thinking that malicious acts by Microsoft is OK; nothing malicious is OK

But that's the whole point, or did you miss it? I am asking, is this really a deliberate malicious act, or could it just be that the engineer who did the packaging didn't think it through and threw both IE and FF versions in it? That's not really too far stretched IMHO, a simple brainfart is all too common. Especially since it doesn't install such at all on computers which don't have it already.

M$

It's really hard to take someone seriously if he uses such childish abbreviations.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Conspiracy - multiple brainfarts
by jabbotts on Thu 10th Jun 2010 12:47 in reply to "RE[3]: Conspiracy"
jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Well, given that Microsoft is a huge organization.. it would be the engineer/developer plus several levels of middle management above him along with QA teams that brainfarted. Like Google's "evil rogue developer" causing three years worth of network packet capture.. the excuse doesn't hold water. They both have the resources to be held to realistic QA standards.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Conspiracy
by gnufreex on Thu 10th Jun 2010 19:02 in reply to "RE[3]: Conspiracy"
gnufreex Member since:
2010-05-06

Your excuse for Microsoft doesn't make any sense. It doesn't matter if it was two developers or one faulty IE plugin, or one drunken developer or whatever. Microsoft do not have any reason to mess with Firefox, other than to sabotage it. They should steer clear from Firefox, any "improvement" to Firefox coming from Microsoft should (and is) counted as attack on Firefox users. Especially if "improvement" is closed source. If they have valid contribution, then they should 3-license it under GPL, LGPL and MPL and submit it to Mozilla for review and maybe it will get included, if it is good enough.

Any other approach is unacceptable.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Conspiracy
by jboss1995 on Mon 14th Jun 2010 18:22 in reply to "RE[3]: Conspiracy"
jboss1995 Member since:
2007-05-02

This is vary easy code to implement, and vary important. Look at it this way. If it was an accident as you claim then it is incompetence on Microsoft's part. If it was purposeful then it was a malicious act. Either way it is not good. And ask yourself which OS would you like to protect your bank account an incompetent one or malicious one?

Reply Parent Score: 1