Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Jun 2010 18:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429389
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-10
Gruber is being a righteous dick about this. He has failed to be critical of this move in any logical way.
There’s no question it’s a dick move on Apple’s part. But what’s the argument against it? That Google gets a pass for being dicks to Apple, and Apple ought to just sit there and take it?
He justifies this as it being Google’s fault for AdMob not being independent! Totally brushing aside the fact that the rule in the first place is the real bullcrap. Apple are not allowing anybody else to play by the same rules as themselves.
No, it’s anti-competition.
Consider me unsubscribed.