Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jun 2010 22:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Geek market control
by Neolander on Thu 10th Jun 2010 11:55
in reply to "RE[4]: Geek market control"
Also, when did we start calling the iPhoneOS iOS? I find it terribly disconcerting (and won't Cisco be mad?)
Complain to Apple. They decided to change the name in order to celebrate iPhone4's release. And knowing some Apple trolls around, anyone which now uses the iPhoneOS term will be flagged as a passeist which does not see how GREAT iOS has become
Edited 2010-06-10 11:57 UTC
RE[5]: Geek market control
by Tony Swash on Thu 10th Jun 2010 14:54
in reply to "RE[4]: Geek market control"
"iOS has an installed base of 100 million
lolwut? Citations or it didn't happen.
Also, when did we start calling the iPhoneOS iOS? I find it terribly disconcerting (and won't Cisco be mad?) "
Do you live in a bunker?
Steve Jobs announced the name change at Apple's World Wide Developers Conference on Monday and also announced the sale of the 100 millionth device running the OS.
The event was carried on just about every news site and tech blog on the planet - what were you doing - dozing?
http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/1006ad9g4hjk/event/index.html
RE[6]: Geek market control
by sorpigal on Thu 10th Jun 2010 19:48
in reply to "RE[5]: Geek market control"
Sorry, I don't rabidly follow apple news when it has nothing to do with things I care about (like gcc, cups, etc). Steve Jobs talking about new apple products ranks very low on my must-see scale, so I don't read further than the headlines.
Now that I know why I am only more irritated. Why confuse things? It's the iPhoneOS and didn't need a name change.





Member since:
2005-11-02
lolwut? Citations or it didn't happen.
Also, when did we start calling the iPhoneOS iOS? I find it terribly disconcerting (and won't Cisco be mad?)