Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Jun 2010 17:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429445
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: MS = half-assed 64-bit
by Neolander on Thu 10th Jun 2010 11:52
in reply to "MS = half-assed 64-bit"
RE[2]: MS = half-assed 64-bit
by chrish on Thu 10th Jun 2010 12:17
in reply to "RE: MS = half-assed 64-bit"





Member since:
2005-07-14
Microsoft hasn't even been able to provide a 64-bit version of VisualStudio, which is more likely to actually make use of the larger address space.
In fact, at work we've been running into cases where VS2010 runs out of memory on a 4GB system just building Silverlight apps.
MS still seems to consider 64-bit to be in the "server" realm. Supporting their 64-bit operating systems with 64-bit apps would, of course, be easier if they supported a "fat" universal binary format, like OS X does.