Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 23:06 UTC
Legal "The row between Google and Apple over the strict iPhone analytics information sharing policies, which Google and its AdMob subsidiary claim unfairly shuts them out of iPhone and iPad advertising in favor of Apple's iAd, may face antitrust scrutiny. According to the Financial Times, US regulators are looking into the situation, though it's not yet clear if a formal investigation will happen."
Thread beginning with comment 429651
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by Paradroid on Fri 11th Jun 2010 08:06 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
Paradroid
Member since:
2010-01-05

Except that Apple are monopolists. Yes, they only control a small market (distribution of iPhone software), and it is the market they created but it is still a perfectly valid monopoly.

Being a monopolist is not necessarily a bad thing, and certainly it is not illegal. However, using this position to monopolize another market is.


That's not right. People can buy other mobile phones and get different app stores. By your reckoning Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft would have a monopoly on consoles which they clearly don't.

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[3]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by ndrw on Fri 11th Jun 2010 10:37 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
ndrw Member since:
2009-06-30

I'm not claiming that Apple are monopolists in the mobile phone market. Clearly they are not, not even in the smart-phone part of it.

They do have a monopoly in the iphone/ipad software distribution market, though. That's alright (these are Apple's products and they can lock them down in whatever way they like) but Apple can't use this position in order to gain an advantage in other markets (like advertising, content containers or development tools). That's what antitrust laws are about.

You could ask "what if they put advertising restrictions in their licenses right from the start". That's an interesting case. You could argue that the advertising market on iPhone didn't exist and Apple have simply made one (so there is no violation of antitrust law). This however is not true when the license is being changed on the fly to shape the existing market.

Reply Parent Score: 5

v RE[4]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by tyrione on Fri 11th Jun 2010 11:01 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"