Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 23:06 UTC
Legal "The row between Google and Apple over the strict iPhone analytics information sharing policies, which Google and its AdMob subsidiary claim unfairly shuts them out of iPhone and iPad advertising in favor of Apple's iAd, may face antitrust scrutiny. According to the Financial Times, US regulators are looking into the situation, though it's not yet clear if a formal investigation will happen."
Thread beginning with comment 429695
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by ndrw on Fri 11th Jun 2010 12:37 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
ndrw
Member since:
2009-06-30

Do they also try to use their distribution channels to block competitor's advertising? Or, do they forbid use of development tools made by a competitor? If not, the whole argument is fairly irrelevant.

Let me repeat my earlier point: to face antitrust investigation the company must fall under two categories: being a monopolist (tick), using this status to fight competitors, either remaining ones or these operating on other markets (tick).

Besides, Microsoft or Sony at least allow third-party retailers in their distribution network. Not a big difference (because they still control encryption keys) but comparing them to Apple is a bit unfair.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[6]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by tyrione on Fri 11th Jun 2010 20:22 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Do they also try to use their distribution channels to block competitor's advertising? Or, do they forbid use of development tools made by a competitor? If not, the whole argument is fairly irrelevant.

Let me repeat my earlier point: to face antitrust investigation the company must fall under two categories: being a monopolist (tick), using this status to fight competitors, either remaining ones or these operating on other markets (tick).

Besides, Microsoft or Sony at least allow third-party retailers in their distribution network. Not a big difference (because they still control encryption keys) but comparing them to Apple is a bit unfair.



http://www.mobclix.com/

These guys can't get enough of Apple and what they're doing at WWDC 2010.

http://blog.mobclix.com/

I don't see Apple telling Mobclix to pea up a rope.

What does Mobclix not do that AdMob does that has Apple mad?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by ndrw on Sat 12th Jun 2010 02:27 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
ndrw Member since:
2009-06-30

What does Mobclix not do that AdMob does that has Apple mad?


Are they "advertising service provider owned by or affiliated with a developer or distributor of mobile devices, mobile operating systems or development environments other than Apple"?

From your other post:
You're clearly not a Anti-Trust/Monopoly lawyer.


I'm not, and honestly, I don't expect any of them to pop in here and write a comment for us.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Comment by mtzmtulivu
by Neolander on Sat 12th Jun 2010 05:21 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by mtzmtulivu"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

What does Mobclix not do that AdMob does that has Apple mad?

Being affiliated to a competitor ?
Not licking Steve Jobs' muddy boots ?

Reply Parent Score: 2