Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Mon 14th Jun 2010 23:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430082
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
... Linux users who believe they can't be infected by malware because they use package managers to install their signed open source software still have no incident on record, after all these years, to contradict that belief.
I think "can't" is a bit too strong a word, I think "extremely unlikely to" is a better phrase. "can't" is too black and white.
"can't" implies that unless it happens, then it cannot and therefore will not happen. This in-turn implies that once it has happened, it can and therefore will happen.
If you were to say that it is extremely unlikely (never in x years), and then it happens, you can still say that it is extremely unlikely (once in x years). "
Fair enough.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Packaging_Tool#History
So then to describe the record for infection of end users systems via APT open source repositories you would suggest it be described as "it is extremely unlikely, say nonce in eleven years".
OK, I can live with that.
Here are the estimated infection rates for another frequently-used system, for objective comparison purposes:
http://gorumors.com/crunchies/malware-infection-rate-worldwide/
Edited 2010-06-15 10:24 UTC