Linked by David Adams on Tue 15th Jun 2010 21:47 UTC, submitted by Anonymous Linux Fan
Thread beginning with comment 430348
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: $@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW
by westlake on Wed 16th Jun 2010 20:48
in reply to "$@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW"
RE[2]: $@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW
by sorpigal on Thu 17th Jun 2010 11:02
in reply to "RE: $@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW"
It's the same fucking hardware! You can't tell me that loading a different OS image on the disk costs that much more, because I know it doesn't. If they have the facility to offer a choice of OS at all (they do, different versions of Windows) then they can offer +1 OS at negligible cost.
RE: $@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW
by nt_jerkface on Fri 18th Jun 2010 01:42
in reply to "$@##% Dell: For the Same $$ a MS one gets better HW"
Junkware can take down the price of Windows and then some, especially since MS is offering Win 7 starter pretty cheap to OEMs.
If it makes you feel any better Linux is making MS bleed when it comes to netbooks. Dell wouldn't even have the option of starter edition if Linux wasn't around.





Member since:
2006-03-11
Yes they really support Linux, NOT. For $299 with the MS win machine gets you 250GB HD and a 6 cell battery. $299 Ubuntu gets you a 160GB HD and a 3 cell battery. You can also upgrade the screen to 1366x768 and other HW with the MS machine, but not with Ubuntu.
So how is it that a free OS gets you less hardware for an OS that cost $$. Hummm? IF I were buying I would get the MS machine due to the differences and install Ubuntu, but MS still get its tax and gets to put a mark in # of MS OSs sold compared to Linux. I suspect that is why Dell offers Ubuntu as they do, because MS wants it that way. :-(