Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Linux Linux Magazine has a profile of Daniel Fore and the Elementary project. Elementary is a Linux distro that's committed to a clean and simple user experience, but it's more than a distro - it's actually a multi-pronged effort to make improvements to the user experience for a whole ecosystem of components, including icons, a GTK theme, Midori improvements, Nautilus, and even Firefox. The work that elementary is doing isn't limited to their own distro, and some of their work is available in current, and perhaps future, Ubuntu releases. The results are really striking, and I think it's probably the handsomest Linux UI I've ever seen.
Thread beginning with comment 430646
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Oh Really? What popular operating system did they copy from???

Copying or borrowing doesn't need to happen with something visual, it can be the lower-level parts. Like f.ex. Microsoft has grabbed lots of networking-related ideas and even code from IBM, Novell, BSD.. And how about the whole windowing idea? You didn't know that there were windowing systems even before Apple and Microsoft stepped on the stage? And that they both took lots of ideas from f.ex. Plan 9?

You really need to study computer and Operating System history a tad bit more if you think Microsoft and Apple were the first ones to invent all of their ideas.

Certainly they have borrowed bits and pieces from here and there but nothing as wholesale and artistically bankrupt as we're seeing here.

As I stated, not everything that is copied or adapted needs to even be visible at all. And yet still, go read f.ex. about Plan 9 at and you might surprise yourself.

Now, having proved your point moot I'll go and introduce my own one: why does it matter that ideas are borrowed, copied and adapted to new systems or circumstances? Nothing in this world would be like it is now if that didn't happen because that's called progress; take something you find good and worth of implementing, and try and make it even better. Or do you really mean that should be the pinnacle of automobile development and no one should have ever taken the idea and improved on it?

Reply Parent Score: 3

jtfolden Member since:

You didn't prove my point moot. LOL

In fact, it seems like you didn't read my original post at all which was entirely focused on the UI and user experience when trying out an OS that behaves differently than they expect despite it looking like a clone.

You're going off on a tangent unrelated to anything I said and you're giving me advice??? lol

Reply Parent Score: -1

siride Member since:

Why use "f.ex." when there is already a perfectly good abbreviation "e.g." available which is more well-known and considerably less grating than "f.ex."?

Reply Parent Score: 4

WereCatf Member since:

Why use "f.ex." when there is already a perfectly good abbreviation "e.g." available which is more well-known and considerably less grating than "f.ex."?

Because English isn't my native language? I've just never really thought about it and since "f.ex." is used by several of the languages I speak I've just kind of gotten accustomed to it. But sure, if it really bothers you so much that you need to make an entire off-topic comment about it I'll try my best to memorize the "e.g." abbreviation.

Edited 2010-06-19 16:44 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3