Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430680
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Why use "f.ex." when there is already a perfectly good abbreviation "e.g." available which is more well-known and considerably less grating than "f.ex."?
Because English isn't my native language? I've just never really thought about it and since "f.ex." is used by several of the languages I speak I've just kind of gotten accustomed to it. But sure, if it really bothers you so much that you need to make an entire off-topic comment about it I'll try my best to memorize the "e.g." abbreviation.
Edited 2010-06-19 16:44 UTC