Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430683
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Everyone thinks they know best...
by phoenix on Mon 21st Jun 2010 06:17
in reply to "RE[3]: Everyone thinks they know best..."
"As for what I'd like to see, FreeBSD + Better hardware support + KDE that hooks into the FreeBSD system features instead of relying on HAL.
Just to avoid misunderstandings.
KDE does not rely on HAL. "
Until someone actually sits down and codes up a non-HAL-based Solid backend, KDE relies on HAL.




Member since:
2005-07-07
Just to avoid misunderstandings.
KDE does not rely on HAL.
HAL is one possible way to access data about the system KDE is running on, i.e. there is a KDE platform plugin that accesses the D-Bus API usually provided by HAL.
Therefore there are two options on how to get system data from other facilities:
- implement the HAL D-Bus interface and use KDE's HAL plugin
- implement a KDE plugin for this other system facility
Option two is probably the better choice, especially in the face of HAL having been abandoned/deprecated by its own developers.