Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Linux Linux Magazine has a profile of Daniel Fore and the Elementary project. Elementary is a Linux distro that's committed to a clean and simple user experience, but it's more than a distro - it's actually a multi-pronged effort to make improvements to the user experience for a whole ecosystem of components, including icons, a GTK theme, Midori improvements, Nautilus, and even Firefox. The work that elementary is doing isn't limited to their own distro, and some of their work is available in current, and perhaps future, Ubuntu releases. The results are really striking, and I think it's probably the handsomest Linux UI I've ever seen.
Thread beginning with comment 430802
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
wargum
Member since:
2006-12-15

Wow man. This is about the problems of Linux adoption on consumers desktops and you come up talking about kiosk-like customized distros, super computers and garage door openers.

the OP stated that Linux is "not ready for mass consumption," which presumes that some other OS is ready for mass consumption. I was merely highlighting the flaw in this reasoning.

OSX and Windows are in many ways less "ready for mass consumption" than Linux.

As long as you can buy millions of products for Win/OS X that say "Requires Windows XP SP2 or above" or "Requires Mac OS X 10.5.4 or above" and for Linux it's like no info at all or like "Requires at least Linux Kernel 2.6.32, X.org 6.9, glibc vX.X", nothing will change.

although I would argue that it is possible that there are more Linux desktops in the world compared to OSX desktops.

Show me a single statistic that claims it is even semi accurate and is assembled by a large number of sources like lots of different websites. The ones that do exist give no hint at all that your assumption could be true. OS X has 5-6 times more users than Linux on the desktop. Why are there so many more products that people can buy for Mac compared to Linux?

Furthermore, I dispute that Windows and OSX have a pool of professional "vertical" applications that Linux/open-source doesn't offer.

Take music production for example. There is only one decent MIDI sequencer (Rosegarden) and Ardour mostly for audio recording. There is nothing like Logic, Cubase, Pro Tools, Digital Performer and the likes. No fully featured DAW at all. And don't even get me started on all the wonderful Plug-Ins and software instruments there are.

And what about a decent video editing software for semi professionals like Final Cut Express or Adobe Premiere Elements?

There are so many examples one can point out to.

Reply Parent Score: 3