Linked by Igor Ljubuncic on Mon 21st Jun 2010 09:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430927
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Dedoimedo
by fewt on Mon 21st Jun 2010 17:13
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Dedoimedo"
And what do you mean by: This is exactly the mistake that Microsoft made in 80s, 90s?
Dedoimedo
Dedoimedo
Do you seriously not know?
it's all about statistical probability.
the home usage security card is seriously overplayed
Real security is agnostic
Exploits exist, vulnerabilities exist. On the same note, huge meteors exist and cosmic ray bursts exist. Likelihood of witnessing one before imminent doom? Not very high.
All mistakes Microsoft made until they decided to take security seriously.
RE[4]: Comment by Dedoimedo
by Dedoimedo on Mon 21st Jun 2010 17:22
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Dedoimedo"
I disagree.
I truly believe what I say and it's as simple as that. Security (for home) is no biggie. In fact, it's boring.
Windows OS is neither the disaster nor the blessing that you might read about here and there. If you pay attention, most boxes were compromised by: no patches and ancient vulnerabilities, deliberate execution of code, user mistakes, not any special inherent flaws in the design.
Dedoimedo





Member since:
2010-06-21
And what do you mean by: This is exactly the mistake that Microsoft made in 80s, 90s?
Dedoimedo