Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430934
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Installed it on Ubuntu
by chris_l on Tue 22nd Jun 2010 09:56
in reply to "RE[2]: Installed it on Ubuntu"
"[q]What really gets me is the horrible installation process. Open up the terminal, install this and that and that... f*ck off!
1995 wants it's FUD back.
"
While it may be FUD to a degree, you know part of the persistence of this type of comment is the fact that,
a) you see certain users, such as on here, bragging about how they have 10 terminal windows open every day, and
b) the moment there is an issue with something on the system, it seems like the command line fixes are the first instructions given - even when there might be an easy GUI-based procedure. [/q]
That's because the command line fixes are the easy,fastest and less error-prone way of resovling *ANY* problem despite what clueless GUI-using morons like yourself may claim.
What could be simpler than copying and pasting text from a email program or a web browser into a terminal?
Most certainly not hunting and pecking through a bunch of GUI-based menus.
Get a fricking clue, *PINHEAD*.
RE[4]: Installed it on Ubuntu
by jtfolden on Tue 22nd Jun 2010 16:41
in reply to "RE[3]: Installed it on Ubuntu"




Member since:
2005-08-12
1995 wants it's FUD back.
"
While it may be FUD to a degree, you know part of the persistence of this type of comment is the fact that,
a) you see certain users, such as on here, bragging about how they have 10 terminal windows open every day, and
b) the moment there is an issue with something on the system, it seems like the command line fixes are the first instructions given - even when there might be an easy GUI-based procedure.