Login to OSNews
Username or Email
Dell Back-Tracks on Linux Being Safer Than Windows
on Tue 22nd Jun 2010 16:14 UTC, submitted by
takes note of some interesting changes Dell made to the Linux page we
linked to last week
. They watered down some of their pro-Linux claims, but not as far as you might think.
Thread beginning with comment 431163
To view parent comment,
To read all comments associated with this story, please
on Wed 23rd Jun 2010 04:14 UTC in reply to "
How the heck would old "Windows Classic" (I'm assuming you mean like Windows 3, 95, and 97) not be considered an OS? As far as I know, being multi-user and network aware are not requirements for being an OS. Maybe you are talking about Windows 1 and 2, which were mostly just shells on top of DOS? (Though I would still call them OSs.)
Windows 1.X through 3.X are operating environments because they require DOS for system calls. Windows for Workgroups 3.11 can be considered either an operating system or operating enviroment(Microsoft marketed it as an operating enviroment) depending on the way you look at it. Though WFW 3.11 made its own sys calls it still needed DOS drivers for some devices like SCSI and CD-ROM.
Here are some articles that I posted in a previous thread a month ago on the subject.
Laurence was just generalizing to the OP because of his claim that Windows wasn't an operating system.
Sign Up For The OSNews Newsletter!
Friends & Fans
OSNews Privacy Statement
Notice to Bulk Emailers
© 1997-2016 OSNews Inc. All Rights Reserved. OSNews and the OSNews logo are trademarks of OSNews.
Source Code © 2007-2016,
, except where noted
Reader comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for them in any way.
All trademarks, icons, and logos shown or mentioned in this web site are the property of their respective owners.
OSNews.com uses icons from the
© 2008 John Resig
Reproduction of OSNews stories is permitted only with explicit authorization from OSNews. Reproductions must be properly credited.