Linked by Igor Ljubuncic on Mon 21st Jun 2010 09:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431165
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Correction: We have seen a few examples of mirrors where someone hacked into a machine, but no distributed software was altered because of that. Just lately, we saw one example of an obscure source code tarball being replaced on some mirrors by a trojaned version. Fortunately this affected the repositories of only two know distributions, Arch and Gentoo, both of which are minor distributions.
It is unlikely that as many as a dozen systems were ever infected by any of this activity.
BTW: I personally install very litlle software from outside the repositories. Why would I? Debian repositories contain over 25,000 packages. There is very little outside that you would actually need.
If we are going to try to scope the problem, lets try to keep it real. Compare this real-world scope for malware infection of Linux systems to the estimated 50% of Windows machines that are infected (perhaps 200 million machines or more) ... that gives it some perspective.