Linked by David Adams on Thu 24th Jun 2010 16:22 UTC, submitted by Governa
Privacy, Security, Encryption About 20 percent of third-party apps available through the Android marketplace allow third-party access to sensitive data, and can do things like make calls and send texts without the owners' knowledge, according to a recent security report from security firm SMobile Systems. There's no indication that any of the highlighted apps is malicious, but the report does underscore the inherent risks of a more open ecosystem as opposed to Apple's oppressive yet more controlled environment, with every app being vetted before availability.
Thread beginning with comment 431475
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Rubbish
by wonea on Fri 25th Jun 2010 12:22 UTC
wonea
Member since:
2005-10-28

Absolute tosh! Honestly, one of the main reasons Microsoft had to deal with decades security problems was because of their dodgy design decisions (ActiveX), and lack of security of focus.

So to silently suggest Apple might have the safest route, and Google should rectify the Android platform to be more like Apple's is utter nonsense. What is this article trying to achieve!? Other than selling security software.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Rubbish
by jabbotts on Fri 25th Jun 2010 15:33 in reply to "Rubbish"
jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

More open development and peer review would be beneficial to Android. On the Apple side, they validate all application submissions but at the same time, every developer makes there own fart application. Android has the potential to foster more shared development (let all the fart app developers polish the same code). At minimum, this would return the peer review benefit of FOSS development. Over in the Maemo stables, the list of programs is shorter but appears to be shared and developed with far more good will than what we're seeing with Android.

Reply Parent Score: 2