Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 22nd Jun 2010 12:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431490
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: You don't need to feel offsensed ;)
by Raffaele on Fri 25th Jun 2010 21:35
in reply to "You don't need to feel offsensed ;)"
and Amiga barely had *ten* apps using proprietary solutions (EGS),... like Photogenics,... And most other applications didn't work with these boards.
Yes. I remember that in the first time GVP cards run EGS standard, but it was just like a framebuffer. And only GVP used EGS. I had seen a GVP IV24 in action and that board used that standard (Now I have one GVP IV 24 of my own in my little museum of computers) but despite the fact that EGS was quite just a framebuffer, the IV24 was a real big bang video studio on a single expansion board. It was a very hit at its times. Only Amiga makes it possible.
http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/impactvision24
Most didn't even have a passthrough for displaying Amiga resolution on a VGA monitor. No, Amiga was already outdated: live with it
You are stuck with ancient days of Amiga. Be content with your memories and leave us evolve in peace by walking step by step.
Why I did use 640x480x8bit instead of 640x200x2bit ? Because it was more confortable ? Because a window or two was enough to fill the whole screen in 640x200 ? Come on... It was available but this mode was so slow it was unusable. Having a chipset on some development boards is different than having a fully working one... And at an affordable price.
I remember using 640x480x8 just only when testing VGA for the first times when I connected my Amiga1200 to VGA screen with the little adapter that was sold by Commodore with A4000 and with Commodore Monitors...
http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/rgb2vga
But sure using that resolution with A1200 was unuseful and a pain in the ass. Don't tell me you were stuck with it, because you could not afford more than an unexpanded A1200?
Then I you have all my comprehension because you really played all your cards with an unuseful ugly graphic screen res.
Edited 2010-06-25 21:41 UTC




Member since:
2007-09-04
>So did Amiga. I had Amiga graphic adapter card and it costed barely the same as my father PC Vesa graphic Card with 2 megabyte of graphic RAM and mounted on his 486 DX2 66MHz...
You don't get it: graphics boards *were standard* and every application were running and taking advantage of it. by that time, CGX/Picasso didn't exist, and Amiga barely had *ten* apps using proprietary solutions (EGS),... like Photogenics,... And most other applications didn't work with these boards. Most didn't even have a passthrough for displaying Amiga resolution on a VGA monitor.
No, Amiga was already outdated: live with it
Why I did use 640x480x8bit instead of 640x200x2bit ?
Because it was more confortable ? Because a window or two was enough to fill the whole screen in 640x200 ? Come on... It was available but this mode was so slow it was unusable.
Having a chipset on some development boards is different than having a fully working one... And at an affordable price.